Vaccines the Holy Water of Big Pharma – Billions Profits – Death, Destruction and Financial Ruin for You.

  • 20 DEATHS PER YEAR FROM PERTUSSIS  or  .00000629% Chance of Dying from Pertussis (whooping cough) VS
  • 4,860 deaths from Pertussis vaccine!

Vaccine injuries are under reported because Pediatricians:

  • Would lose their bonus for reporting adverse vaccine reactions – see Blue Cross Incentive page 15 below
  • AND they don’t know about the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national vaccine safety surveillance program co-sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

From Kari Bundy:  Video below – A lot of people worry about their children dying from Pertussis (whooping cough) – we DEFINITELY did! If I’d taken the time to simply do the math, I would have realized that my son only had a .00000629% chance of dying from this disease. Instead, we vaccinated him out of fear and he died (4 days later) as a result of the vaccine. Doctors don’t report vax damage because they will lose their bonus

Higher Death Rates from Pertussis Vaccine vs Natural Pertussis Infection

Complete Booklet Blue Cross Incentive see page 15

Summary of video VAERS Reports for Pertussis

38,199 events for Pertussis under reported by 10% see Dr. Suzanne Humphries video below – Doctors don’t know about reporting vaccine injuries.

381,990 real numbers

4,860 deaths

Visit VAERS and search adverse events: https://vaers.hhs.gov/index
Marcella Piper-Terry also wrote this excellent article about Pertussis and VAERS:
http://vaxtruth.org/2015/01/pertussis/

US INFANT MORTALITY RATES – US #1 MOST SHOTS OUT OF 34 TOP COUNTIES

Doctors Make Huge Bonuses for Vaccinating Your Child – Big Pharma No Liability for Injury!

According to CDC – Tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis are very serious diseases. Tdap vaccine can protect us from these diseases.  And, Tdap vaccine given to pregnant women can protect newborn babies against pertussis. The most frequent pregnancy-specific AE was spontaneous abortion in 22 (16.7%) reports.

Higher Death Rates from Pertussis Vaccine vs Natural Pertussis Infection

World Mercury Project

Let’s Talk About Whooping Cough

Update:  This article is very heavily referenced with scientific research. Some have commented that it may be overwhelming. I believe it is important to reference everything we say, because if we don’t, we are accused of following Jenny McCarthy and making our decisions based on “a single study from England that was debunked…”

I would like for everyone to really read this article and be sure to save the links to peer-reviewed medical literature that are included. However, I also understand the feeling of being overwhelmed.

My friend Dana and I have put together a youtube video, which is basically “the Cliff’s Notes” on this article. It may help to watch and listen to this first. (Dana is the brilliance behind the graphic design… )

Let’s talk about those whooping cough outbreaks, shall we?

And while we’re at it, can we talk about DTaP? The Diptheria,Tetanus and acellular Pertussis vaccine? We have to. Because that’s what’s causing the outbreaks. I’m betting at this point 98% of those on the pro-vaccine side have stopped reading. It astounds me how many people have made up their minds, and they seem to think they “know” everything there is to know about the whooping cough outbreaks and DTaP/TDap vaccines. I could be wrong about this, but it appears that many listen to Paul Offit as if he is a “prophet,” and they don’t feel the need to think for themselves or look further. When we are talking about science, and the human body, I just don’t see how we can ever say there is nothing left to learn. The fact that we never know everything there is to know is the basis of scientific inquiry – and that includes science that influences the medical decision-making process. For those who are still with me, thanks for sticking around and for being brave enough to use your own intellect and the discernment God gave you. Here we go…

The first thing I want to say about the acellular vaccine is that the reason it was developed in the first place was because the whole cell pertussis vaccine was so dangerous and too many babies were dying. SIDS, or Sudden Infant Death Syndrome was one of the most serious adverse events following vaccination with the whole cell pertussis vaccine. Prior to the establishment of the 1986 Vaccine-Injury Compensation Program (VICP), parents whose children were seriously injured or killed by vaccines could pursue legal action against vaccine manufacturers. There were so many lawsuits being filed that vaccine makers basically held the U.S. federal government hostage and threatened to stop making vaccines altogether if the government didn’t step in and protect them from lawsuits. And that is why now, if vaccines injure or kill your child, you cannot sue the vaccine manufacturer. For more information on the history of DTP, please go here and here.

So… it was known that the DTP (or DPT) vaccine was very dangerous.

In 1991, the first DTaP vaccine was licensed in the U.S. on the premise that the acellular version would be safer and would produce fewer side effects and deaths than the DTwP (whole cell) version of the vaccine. There are two versions (and multiple producers) of the acellular vaccine. DTaP is given to infants and children up to age ten. TDap is given to persons who are 10 and older, including adults. Much of the information in this post refers to both DTaP and TDaP, as they are both acellular pertussis vaccines.

Safety studies for the DTaP vaccine are problematic in that the new vaccine was tested against the old vaccine. There was no true placebo group. This is common practice in vaccine safety studies. Other problems with the clinical safety studies include the use of unequal numbers of subjects between groups, and very short follow-up of participants; generally 3-4 days post-vaccination. It is also noted that in the clinical trials there is a consistent rate of attrition (children who dropped out or were removed from the study by their parents), which resulted in fewer and fewer participants as the studies progressed. There is no mention in the vaccine-manufacturer’s inserts as to why the children were removed from the study. We can speculate that one possible reason for parents pulling their child from a study might be due to the child having an adverse reaction, and the parent not wanting to take that risk again, but that would just be speculation on our part. There is some evidence to suggest this may be the case, judging from the fact that in the clinical trials, the percentage of children who experienced systemic reactions increased with each successive vaccine in the series. In other words, the percentage of children whose parents reported adverse reactions was higher at doses 4 and 5 than at doses 1 and 2.  To review this information for yourself, you can obtain the vaccine manufacturer’s inserts here, with the exception of the Tripedia insert, which is no longer available on that site. It can be obtained here. I wrote a piece a while back on the Tripedia vaccine, which some folks will tell you is no longer being used in the U.S. This is incorrect. It is still used and is now being combined with the HiB vaccine to form ActHIB and TriHiBit. Just an FYI… Read more here

====

Disclaimer

All content provided on the “AirCrap.org” blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following or viewing any link on this site.

THIS  IS NOT MEDICAL ADVICE BUT POINTS OF VIEW OF THE MEDICAL SYSTEM

FAIR USE STATEMENT
This post may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available within this transformative or derivative work for the purpose of education, commentary and criticism, is being distributed without profit, and is believed to be “fair use” in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/