If Wireless Radiation Exposure Is No Big Deal – Why Do Manuals Include Guidelines and Warnings?

If Wireless Radiation Exposure Is No Big Deal - Why Do Manuals Include Guidelines and Warnings?

If Wireless Radiation Exposure Is No Big Deal, Why Do Manuals for Cell Phones, iPads, Wi-Fi Routers, Etc. Include Guidelines and Warnings?

By B.N. Frank

Many products we buy for personal use are sold with a separate manual booklet or pamphlet that includes guidelines for safe use.  Some digital products include this within the device itself instead of separately.

Since many of us don’t bother to read the manuals and the guidelines thoroughly (if at all), here are two examples of guidelines for safe use provided by cell phone manufacturers in 2011:

The Apple iPhone 4 safety manual says users’ radiation exposure should not exceed FCC guidelines: “When using iPhone near your body for voice calls or for wireless data transmission over a cellular network, keep iPhone at least 15 millimeters (5/8 inch) away from the body.”

BlackBerry Bold advises users to “keep the BlackBerry device at least 0.98 inch (25 millimeters) from your body when the BlackBerry device is transmitting.”

CNN explains these recommendations by quoting experts:

The logic behind such recommendations is that the further the phone is from the body, the less radiation is absorbed.  

Finally, cell phones emit the most radiation when they are attempting to connect to cellular towers. A moving phone, or a phone in an area with a weak signal, has to work harder, giving of more radiation. So users can avoid using their cell phones in elevators, buildings and rural areas if they want to reduce their exposure, experts say.

Similar expert recommendations have been provided over the years.  From Consumer Reports in 2016:

And whenever you are gaming or reading on your phone, try to hold the device an arm’s length from your face.  (Most of us keep it just 8 to 12 inches away.) If you find this makes onscreen words too hard to read, try making the font larger.  Not only does holding the phone farther away from your eyes reduce the likelihood of eye strain, but it also cuts your exposure to the low-level radiation the phone emits. This is important because a recent study by the National Toxicology Program suggests a link between cell phone radiation and cancer in rats.

So the question is again – if wireless radiation exposure is no big deal – why the guidelines at all – or the recommendations?  Makes one think…

Digging deeper – according to some scientists, U.S. federal safety standards and guidelines are outdated and inaccurate in regard to electronic and wireless products. From EHTrust:

Currently there are no national or international “standards” for safe levels of the radiation emitted by wireless or microwave devices. Instead, the US government adopted “guidelines” developed by industry based on decades old research.

… proper long term safety testing was not done to ensure the public was protected from all possible harm.

In fact, no “safe” level has been scientifically determined for children or pregnant women…

Compliance with “federal safety standards” does not assure your nor your family’s safety.

Coincidentally “safety” testing on these products is done on plastic mannequin heads and bodies. D’oh!

There have already been hundreds of studies and many have proven harm.  But disputes as to how much wireless radiation exposure is safe or unsafe will likely continue.  For those of us old enough to remember, this is like cigarettes all over again.

It also doesn’t change the fact that all of these personal products include user guidelines and warnings.  It’s hard to dispute that there must be a reason for that.

“Your Cell Phone’s Been Nuking Your Johnson”

Additional related links:

Quarterback Tom Brady’s Holistic Lifestyle Includes No Electronics in the Bedroom. Supermodel Wife Doesn’t Allow Cell Phones Near the Bed
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01/quarterback-tom-bradys-holistic-lifestyle-includes-no-electronics-bedroom-supermodel-wife-doesnt-allow-cell-phones-near-bed.html

Research Results Don’t Change Fact That Silicon Valley Parents Have Already Limited Their Own Children’s Exposure to Wireless Radiation Tech
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/02/research-results-dont-change-fact-silicon-valley-parents-limited-childrens-exposure-cell-phones-wireless-radiation-tech-many-years.html

Your Pets May Be Affected by WiFi and Electronic Devices Even if You Aren’t.
https://www.activistpost.com/2017/12/pets-may-affected-wi-fi-electronic-devices-even-arent.html

Beyond Digital Addiction: Your Kids May Be Affected by Wi-Fi and Electronic Devices Even If You Aren’t
https://www.activistpost.com/2017/12/beyond-digital-addiction-kids-may-affected-wi-fi-electronic-devices-even-arent.html

Firefighters Don’t Want Cell Towers Near Their Stations, But 50+ Federal Bills Allow Cell Towers In Residential Yards and Pretty Much Everywhere Else
https://www.activistpost.com/2017/12/5g-federal-bills.html

The American Cancer Society claimed “Smart” Meters could increase cancer risk – in 2014.
https://www.naturalblaze.com/2017/11/american-cancer-society-claimed-smart-meters-increase-cancer-risk-2014.html

Cancer Expert Declares Cell Phone and Wireless Radiation as Carcinogenic to Humans
https://ehtrust.org/cancer-expert-declares-cell-phone-wireless-radiation-carcinogenic-humans/

EMF Controversy Exposed
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/01/20/emf-controversy-exposed.aspx

Warning: Your Cell Phone May Be Hazardous to Your Health
http://www.gq.com/story/warning-cell-phone-radiation

Popular Science” Magazine Still Blows Off Cell Phone Radiation Warnings Despite Reports From The World Health Organization, Dr. Oz, Stephen Colbert and Others
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01/popular-science-magazine-still-blows-off-cell-phone-radiation-despite-warnings-world-health-organization-dr-oz-stephen-colbert.html

Dear Cell Phone Radiation Warning Naysayers, MeThinks Thou Protests Too Much
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01/dear-cell-phone-radiation-warning-naysayers-methinks-thou-protests-much.html

Most Don’t Question “Sensitivity” To Air Pollution But Still Question “Sensitivity” To Electrical Pollution
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01/dont-question-sensitivity-air-pollution-still-question-sensitivity-electrical-pollution.html

Tech Industry Promoting Devices They Claim Not As Addictive Is Like Big Tobacco Manufacturing “Safer” Cigarettes And Smoking Cessation Products
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01/tech-devices-less-addictive-big-tobacco-safer-cigarettes.html

Do You Really Believe Your Cell Phone (i.e. Microwave Transceiver) Is NOT Harming Your Health?
http://electromagneticsafeplanet.com/2017/10/12/do-you-really-believe-your-cell-phone-i-e-microwave-transceiver-is-not-harming-your-health/

Cell Phones and Erectile Dysfunction
https://www.askmen.com/news/sports/cell-phones-and-erectile-dysfunction.html

1 thought on “If Wireless Radiation Exposure Is No Big Deal – Why Do Manuals Include Guidelines and Warnings?

  1. If you read the last three chapters in Robert O. Becker’s book “The Body Electric”, he mentions that with some radiation that lower levels seem to be even worse for people than higher levels. The Russians knew about the danger of microwave radiation and took steps to protect their workers at power stations.
    When the US embassy in Moscow was radiated with microwaves, all three of the ambassadors died of cancer. It also affected the white blood cell counts of the employees there.
    It’s also the people who have cell phones, the radiation was causing hormone changes in my brain with the resultant frequent menustral cycles (it got to be 2 times every 28 days, ever 15 days, trust me that sucks!). Staying away from those with cell phones brought me back to normal within a month. Even avoiding phones yourself won’t save you if you are close to others with them- even in the supermarkets and stores, everyone has one.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: