SCoPEx May Soon Be Underway in Arizona — Unnamed Material Sprayed in AZ Stratosphere

ScopEx May Soon Be Underway in Arizona — Unnamed Material Sprayed in AZ Stratosphere

With “Unknown” Environmental Effects – Raising Millions for Harvard

SCoPEx – Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment

ETC Briefing Location World View Spaceport Tucson, Arizona, USA

The O’odham Nation, represented by a handful of tribal governments, have lived in the area around the World View Spaceport for thousands of years.

June 20, 2018 Dr Naomi Wolf

DailyClout has been reporting on the planned SCoPEx experiment in Arizona, using a new geoengineering technology called “Solar Radiation Management” or SRM. The experiment is being run by a Harvard consortium, including Dr David Keith, Dr Gernot Wagner, and, in a stunning conflict of interest, Harvard’s Vice Provost, Dr Dustin Tingley.

SCoPEx means that Dr David Keith and his team will release an unnamed particulate from a weather balloon or other form of aircraft, in the stratosphere over Tucson Arizona. The planned release is for 2017-1018, which means that it is either late, or already underway.

Community concerns in Arizona involve the fact that Harvard won’t confirm the nature of the particulate: Dr Keith has identified it at times as “sulphates”, meaning pollution; “alumina”, which has serious health hazards if inhaled and has been linked to Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s Disease and dementia; and chalk. Thought the experiment has been planned for 2017-2018, Dr Keith and Harvard won’t confirm when the flights will begin, or indeed if they are already underway. They won’t confirm how many flights are planned, or how much material will be released over the people of Arizona. Some climate scientists fear that such a release, with many unknown outcomes, may further damage the ozone layer.

Another serious concern that DailyClout and many of its Arizona community members share, is that the larger  environmental effects of SCoPEx are, according to geoengineering industry reports, “unknown.”  The health effects of the release of this particulate — in amounts that aren’t disclosed, just as the particulate itself is not being disclosed — are unknown.

The scientists leading the push to adopt SRM tech do confirm that once SRM has begun, it would have to be continued (by the way, generating massive profits for Harvard, Dr Keith, Bill Gates and the VCs and hedge funds that have invested in SCoPEx) and that if it is ever stopped, “catastrophic warming” would result.

The stated goal of proponents of Solar Radiation Management is to be able to create a “sunshade world” in which a screen or shield made up of particulates, such as “alumina” sprayed into the stratosphere, or sulphates — would create conditions worldwide such as that after the eruption of Mt Pinatubo; a white shell around the earth at the level of the sky, to block the sun. Notably, one of the Dr Keith’s partners in his private company Carbon Engineering, is one of Canada’s biggest fossil fuel moguls. A concern of many of those who follow DailyClout’s reporting on SCoPEx, is that testing and promotion of SRM is being embraced uncritically by governments at a time when powerful interests are being challenged by the growth of solar energy systems, and at a moment when Wall Street is losing interest in fossil fuels. A “sunshade world” would dim the effectiveness of solar energy worldwide.

ScopEx May Soon Be Underway in Arizona — Unnamed Material Sprayed in AZ StratosphereWhile the experiment is being presented — using Harvard to “academic-wash” the commercial nature of the venture — as an impartial scientific inquiry to advance our Plan B possibilities in the event that existing technologies cannot stem global warming, in fact SCoPEx is a highly privatized venture involving serious commercial conflicts of interest for Harvard. Harvard boasts of its “power to convene” government stakeholders from around the world, to learn about SRM and to prepare to use it. But since Harvard owns the IP and patents of the SRM technology generated, Harvard would benefit financially by governments around the world buying or licensing the tech from — Harvard. This is especially problematic as SCoPEx has accepted $100,000 in taxpayer funds, and since Harvard has status as an educational institution that accepts a great deal of additional public money. To refuse to disclose to the public important details of such a serious experiment upon the public, which is so highly privatized, even while accepting public money, is concerning to many.

This tech has been funded by various venture capitalists and hedge fund owners, as well as by Bill Gates. According to geoengineering industry newsletters, Dr Keith of Harvard has raised $7 million dollars from a $20 million dollar total raise planned. Dr Keith’s colleague Dr Gernot Wagner disputes that amount when contacted by, but given multiple opportunities to confirm where the flights will take off from, how much material they will release, what the material is, what the effects on the environment and health may be, what the ownership ir equity stake is for the investors in SCoPEx, and what the governnance is that allows these flights, Dr Keith and Dr Wagner and even Dr Tingley, have not given answers to these questions.

Also of concern is that when citizens of Arizona posted images of unusual whited-out skies in Arizona, and skies with unusual sprays of white particulate in the air, and asked Dr Wagner and Dr Keith directly on Twitter if the skies’ appearance had any relationship to SCoPEx, Dr Wagner and Dr Keith did not answer them.

Citizens of Arizona also asked Dr Wagner, at DailyClout’s invitation, to explain the possible effect of SCoPEx on the likelihood of wildfires in Arizona, as dry conditions have become a problem there. Aluminum heightens combustion, so many would consider that these are reasonable questions from those Arizona citizens whom Harvard pans to spray with unnamed particulates. Dr Wagner refused to reply.

A related issue is that the law forbids experimentation on human beings in America without their consent. IN deed, Harvard’s own medical ethics guidelines forbid medical or scientific experimentation on human beings without their consent. Consent is a specific transaction in which medical subjects sign a consent form indicating that they understand the risks of the experiment and that they give their informed consent. This has not happened with Harvard and the people of Arizona on whom Harvard plans to experiment. So in this regard, many feel that the experiment is illegal.

Which brings up the issue of governance. It is illegal to experiment on humans without informed consent according to US laws. This is why I continually ask Dr Keith in public, on behalf of DailyClout, what governance oversees the SCoPEx experiment. His response to me in writing is “it’s complicated.”

According to a Geoengineering Industry website, SCoPEx will be released from an Indian reservation. Dr Keith has not denied this. Of course, Indian reservations are not subject to the laws of the United States. If this report is indeed correct, it is quite concerning to many citizens of Arizona from whom we are hearing, that an experiment that is illegal in the US is being conducted on them, using the cover of a non-US jurisdictional system.

The prospect of a great university profiting form tech and IP generated by a launch that is illegal in the US outside of an Indian reservation, and doing so via  experimentation on consenting Arizona citizens in a way that Harvard’s on medical ethics guidelines prohibit, and in a context in which all reportorial inquiry has been deflected, is a remarkable situation. It is causing alarm for many environmentalists, many Harvard alumni, and many members of the affected communities of Arizona.

It’s not just Arizona that should be pushing for answers and oversight, as, as one JetBlue pilot told me, winds at that level can travel for a thousand miles.

All of us may soon be affected by SCoPEx.


Dr Naomi Wolf – they have been doing this for years!


9 thoughts on “SCoPEx May Soon Be Underway in Arizona — Unnamed Material Sprayed in AZ Stratosphere

  1. This is so incredibly wrong! I live in Santa Fe and have a second home south of Tucson . I’ve chosen these places for the sun. No one seems to notice even in Santa Fe that our skies are constantly bombarded with chemtrails.
    What can we as people do? We need a massive uprising all over the states to protest this. Why can’t a huge group go to this site in Tucson and stop the balloon from going up? Protest until they have to change the plan.

    Its one of the biggest offenses to our freedom we face today. I want to do some something that makes a difference.

    1. See the 2 documents below I posted. Then present them to authorities and other alternative media explaining how they have been violated and that someone should be hung for no action after knowing these truths..

    1. MILITARY AND SECURITY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX funded by Pentagon as Unacknowledged Special Projects. Remember all that missing money and with no accountability?

  2. Again in their own words, so now how do we enforce. ref. >

    Agreement Between Canada and the United States of America Relating to the Exchange of Information on Weather Modification Activities

    E103819 – CTS 1975 No. 11

    The Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America,

    Aware, because of their geographic proximity, that the effects of weather modification activities carried out by either Party or its nationals may affect the territory of the other;

    Noting the diversity of weather modification activities in both Canada and the United States by private parties, by State and Provincial authorities, and by the Federal Governments;

    Believing that the existing state of knowledge warrants the expectation of further development over a period of time in the science and technology of weather modification;

    Taking into particular consideration the special traditions of prior notification and consultation and the close cooperation that have historically characterized their relations;

    Believing that a prompt exchange of pertinent information regarding the nature and extent of weather modification activities of mutual interest may facilitate the development of the technology of weather modification for their mutual benefit;

    Recognizing the desirability of the development of international law relating to weather modification activities having transboundary effects;

    Have agreed as follows:
    Article I

    As used in this Agreement:

    “Weather modification activities”, means activities performed with the intention of producing artificial changes in the composition, behaviour, or dynamics of the atmosphere;
    “Weather modification activities of mutual interest” means weather modification activities carried out in or over the territory of a Party within 200 miles of the international boundary; or such activities wherever conducted, which, in the judgment of a Party, may significantly affect the composition, behaviour, or dynamics of the atmosphere over the territory of the other Party;
    “Responsible agencies” means the Atmospheric Environment Service of Canada and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States, or such other agencies as the Parties may designate;
    “Reporting requirements” means the requirements established by the domestic laws or regulations of the Parties for reporting to the responsible agencies information relating to weather modification activities by persons or entities engaged in weather modification.

    Article II

    Information relating to weather modification activities of mutual interest acquired by a responsible agency through its reporting requirements or otherwise, shall be transmitted as soon as practicable to the responsible agency of the other Party. Whenever possible, this information shall be transmitted prior to the commencement of such activities. It is anticipated that such information will be transmitted within five working days of its receipt by a responsible agency.
    Information to be provided by the responsible agencies shall include copies of relevant reports received through the reporting procedures after the effective date of this Agreement, and such other information and interpretation as the responsible agency might consider appropriate.
    Nothing herein shall be construed to require transmission to the other responsible agency of information, the disclosure of which is prohibited by law, or of information which, in the judgment of the responsible agency, is proprietary information.

    Article III

    The responsible agencies shall consult with a view to developing compatible reporting formats, and to improving procedures for the exchange of information.
    Article IV

    In addition to the exchange of information pursuant to Article II of this Agreement, each Party agrees to notify and to fully inform the other concerning any weather modification activities of mutual interest conducted by it prior to the commencement of such activities. Every effort shall be made to provide such notice as far in advance of such activities as may be possible, bearing in mind the provisions of Article V of this Agreement.
    Article V

    The Parties agree to consult, at the request of either Party, regarding particular weather modification activities of mutual interest. Such consultations shall be initiated promptly on the request of a Party, and in cases of urgency may be undertaken through telephonic or other rapid means of communication. Consultations shall be carried out in light of the Parties’ laws, regulations, and administrative practices regarding weather modification.
    Article VI

    The Parties recognize that extreme emergencies, such as forest fires, may require immediate commencement by one of them of weather modification activities of mutual interest notwithstanding the lack of sufficient time for prior notification pursuant to Article IV, or for consultation pursuant to Article V. In such cases, the Party commencing such activities shall notify and fully inform the other Party as soon as practicable, and shall promptly enter into consultations at the request of the other Party.
    Article VII

    Nothing herein relates to or shall be construed to affect the question of responsibility or liability for weather modification activities, or to imply the existence of any generally applicable rule of international law.
    Article VIII

    Each Party shall conduct an annual review of this Agreement while it remains in force, and shall inform the other of its views regarding the Agreement’s operation and effectiveness and the desirability of its amendment to reflect the evolution of the science and technology of weather modification and of international law. The Parties shall meet periodically, by mutual agreement, or at the request of either, to review the implementation of this Agreement or to consider other issues related to weather modification.
    Article IX

    This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature. It may be amended by mutual agreement of the Parties and may be terminated by either Party upon six months written notice to the other Party.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Representatives of the two Governments have signed this Agreement.

    DONE in duplicate at Washington this twenty sixth day of March 1975 in English and French, each version being equally authentic.

    Jeanne Sauvé
    For the Government of Canada

    Christian A. Herter
    For the Government of the Un

  3. Your readers must know the truth.
    Universal Declaration of Human Rights @ 60+ logo UN Documents
    Gathering a body of global agreements logo of United Nations General Assembly
    Home | Sustainable Development | Education | Water | Culture of Peace | Human Rights | Keywords | Search

    Adopted by Resolution 31/72 of the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1976.

    The Convention was opened for signature at Geneva on 18 May 1977.

    Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques

    The States Parties to this Convention,

    Guided by the interest of consolidating peace, and wishing to contribute to the cause of halting the arms race, and of bringing about general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control, and of saving mankind from the danger of using new means of warfare,

    Determined to continue negotiations with a view to achieving effective progress towards further measures in the field of disarmament,

    Recognizing that scientific and technical advances may open new possibilities with respect to modification of the environment,

    Recalling the Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, adopted at Stockholm on 16 June 1972,

    Realizing that the use of environmental modification techniques for peaceful purposes could improve the interrelationship of man and nature and contribute to the preservation and improvement of the environment for the benefit of present and future generations,

    Recognizing, however, that military or any other hostile use of such techniques could have effects extremely harmful to human welfare,

    Desiring to prohibit effectively military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques in order to eliminate the dangers to mankind from such use, and affirming their willingness to work towards the achievement of this objective,

    Desiring also to contribute to the strengthening of trust among nations and to the further improvement of the international situation in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,

    Have agreed as follows:

    Article I

    1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.

    2. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to assist, encourage or induce any State, group of States or international organization to engage in activities contrary to the provisions of paragraph 1 of this article.

    Article II

    As used in article 1, the term “environmental modification techniques” refers to any technique for changing – through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes – the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space.

    Article III

    1. The provisions of this Convention shall not hinder the use of environmental modification techniques for peaceful purposes and shall be without prejudice to the generally recognized principles and applicable rules of international law concerning such use.

    2. The States Parties to this Convention undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of scientific and technological information on the use of environmental modification techniques for peaceful purposes. States Parties in a position to do so shall contribute, alone or together with other States or international organizations, to international economic and scientific co-operation in the preservation, improvement and peaceful utilization of the environment, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.

    Article IV

    Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to take any measures it considers necessary in accordance with its constitutional processes to prohibit and prevent any activity in violation of the provisions of the Convention anywhere under its jurisdiction or control.

    Article V

    1. The States Parties to this Convention undertake to consult one another and to co-operate in solving any problems which may arise in relation to the objectives of, or in the application of the provisions of, the Convention. Consultation and co-operation pursuant to this article may also be undertaken through appropriate international procedures within the framework of the United Nations and in accordance with its Charter. These international procedures may include the services of appropriate international organizations, as well as of a Consultative Committee of Experts as provided for in paragraph 2 of this article.

    2. For the purposes set forth in paragraph 1 of this article, the Depositary shall within one month of the receipt of a request from any State Party to this Convention, convene a Consultative Committee of Experts. Any State Party may appoint an expert to the Committee whose functions and rules of procedure are set out in the annex which constitutes an integral part of this Convention. The Committee shall transmit to the Depositary a summary of its findings of fact, incorporating all views and information presented to the Committee during its proceedings. The Depositary shall distribute the summary to all States Parties.

    3. Any State Party to this Convention which has reason to believe that any other State Party is acting in breach of obligations deriving from the provisions of the Convention may lodge a complaint with the Security Council of the United Nations. Such a complaint should include all relevant information as well as all possible evidence supporting ItS validity.

    4. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to cooperate in carrying out any investigation which the Security Council may initiate, in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, on the basis of the complaint received by the Council. The Security Council shall inform the States Parties of the results of the investigation.

    5. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to provide or support assistance, in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, to any State Party which so requests, if the Security Council decides that such Party has been harmed or is likely to be harmed as a result of violation of the Convention.

    Article VI

    1. Any State Party to this Convention may propose amendments to the Convention. The text of any proposed amendment shall be submitted to the Depositary, who shall promptly circulate it to all States Parties.

    2. An amendment shall enter into force for all States Parties to this Convention which have accepted it, upon the deposit with the Depositary of instruments of acceptance by a majority of States Parties. Thereafter it shall enter into force for any remaining State Party on the date of deposit of its instrument of acceptance.

    Article VII

    This Convention shall be of unlimited duration.

    Article VIII

    1. Five years after the entry into force of this Convention, a conference of the States Parties to the Convention shall be convened by the Depositary at Geneva, Switzerland. The conference shall review the operation of the Convention with a view to ensuring that its purposes and provisions are being realized, and shall in particular examine the effectiveness of the provisions of paragraph 1 of article I in eliminating the dangers of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques.

    2. At intervals of not less than five years thereafter, a majority of the States Parties to this Convention may obtain, by submitting a proposal to this effect to the Depositary, the convening of a conference with the same objectives.

    3. If no conference has been convened pursuant to paragraph 2 of this article within ten years following the conclusion of a previous conference, the Depositary shall solicit the views of all States Parties to this Convention concerning the convening of such a conference. If one third or ten of the States Parties, whichever number is less, respond affirmatively, the Depositary shall take immediate steps to convene the conference.

    Article IX

    1. This Convention shall be open to all States for signature. Any State which does not sign the Convention before its entry into force in accordance with paragraph 3 of this article may accede to it at any time.

    2. This Convention shall be subject to ratification by signatory States. Instruments of ratification or accession shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

    3. This Convention shall enter into force upon the deposit of instruments of ratification by twenty Governments in accordance with paragraph 2 of this article.

    4. For those States whose instruments of ratification or accession are deposited after the entry into force of this Convention, it shall enter into force on the date of the deposit of their instruments of ratification or accession.

    5. The Depositary shall promptly inform all signatory and acceding States of the date of each signature, the date of deposit of each instrument of ratification or accession and the date of the entry into force of this Convention and of any amendments thereto, as well as of the receipt of other notices.

    6. This Convention shall be registered by the Depositary in accordance with Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.

    Article X

    This Convention, of which the Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations, who shall send duly certified copies thereof to the Governments of the signatory and acceding States.

    In witness whereof, the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Convention

    Done at Geneva, on the 18 day of May 1977.
    Annex to the Convention

    Consultative Committee of Experts

    1. The Consultative Committee of Experts shall undertake to make appropriate findings of fact and provide expert views relevant to any problem raised pursuant to paragraph 1 of article V of this Convention by the State Party requesting the convening of the Committee.

    2. The work of the Consultative Committee of Experts shall be organized in such a way as to permit it to perform the functions set forth in paragraph 1 of this annex. The Committee shall decide procedural questions relative to the organization of its work, where possible by consensus, but otherwise by a majority of those present and voting. There shall be no voting on matters of substance.

    3. The Depositary or his representative shall serve as the Chairman of the Committee.

    4. Each expert may be assisted at meetings by one or more advisers.

    5. Each expert shall have the right, through the Chairman, to request from States, and from international organizations, such information and assistance as the expert considers desirable for the accomplishment of the Committee’s work.
    Home | Sustainable Development | Education | Water | Culture of Peace | Human Rights | Keywords | Search
    logo of the United Nations UN Documents: Gathering a Body of Global Agreements
    has been compiled by the NGO Committee on Education of the
    Conference of NGOs from United Nations web sites
    and made possible through freely a

  4. Dr. Wolf, I would like to help publicize this via my radio program, plus perhaps a livestream broadcast to multiple platforms. I have information to share on connecting the geoengineering crimes with many other concurrent assaults against humanity and the biosphere. Please contact me at your convenience.

    Richard Sacks, Host
    Lost Arts Radio
    Independent holistic health scientist since 1965
    Essene teacher and private health consultant

  5. If this is a duplicate, I apologize, I just posted a comment a moment ago and it disappeared completely as soon as I clicked on “post,” so in case it is gone, I’m posting it once more. I would like to help increase awareness of the issue and project brought up in this article, though I am fully aware that the chemtrail “geoengineering” (too respectable a name in my opinion) has been going on for decades. I have done a lot of research in how this massive crime against humanity relates to so many others on huge scales that are proceeding in parallel with it. Dr. Wolfe if you want to contact me we can share important information and perhaps do a show on my radio program, or with the addition of video livestream on multiple platforms. Contact me at your convenience if this interests you.
    Richard Sacks, Host
    Lost Arts Radio
    Independent holistic health scientist since 1965
    Essene teacher and private health consultant

  6. It’s probably because of this group who has found a child sex ring torture camp down there and hundreds are checking out the desert in Tucson for more and also the mayor of Tucson is a Rothchild. Urgent, Red-Alert-Urgent to V.O.P. Alpha Co. Team Pulaski.
    Seems now they want to poison you from the sky more then they have in the past. Please tweet President Trump and even Kanye West many times a day as some of us are doing too. Retweet their Tweets so all their followers have a chance to see it. This is crazy danger people.…/scopex-may-soon-be-underway-in-a…/
    What to tweet Pres. Trump and Kanye and add a little of your own words and prayers. STOP THE REAL TERRORISM OF CHEMTRAILS/HARRP AND FORCED VACCINES, AMEN. They are spraying more heavily with the poisons and stronger EMF’s for HARRP. Jesus is Lord, Amen.

Comments are held for moderation and your email will NOT be used for Spam. Troll comments not accepted so don’t waste your time.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: